Difference between revisions of "Talk:Exhibit 24"

Revision as of 21:53, 28 April 2007

Speculation

It is suspected that Exhibit Twenty Four is a "catch-up" site, listing all of and linking to the ARG sites in order to provide a back-story research point to people just joining the ARG.

At least, that's my theory, and I'm sticking to it.
-- justnine, 15:17 27th April 2007 (GMT+0100)

--That probably is the case, plus a couple of new ideas are introduced into the fold.

Also, on the prospect of [CLASSIFIED] being Reznor... there is nothing to suggest that it could not be any other NiN members... but as of right now I believe that Reznor is the "best" choice to decide who is [CLASSIFIED].CrotchPope 08:19, 27 April 2007 (PDT)

Actually, I'm unconvinced. There could be more than one classified person - there are three mentions of "classified" - the one mentioned at 24.11.2's entry could well be TR, but the other two not. Until we have cast iron evidence, then this is personal opinion and you should probably remove the [CLASSIFIED] part from the wiki page and put it into this talk page instead! It's nothing personal, it's simply because this is personal opinion and not cold, hard fact!
-- justnine, 16:40 27th April 2007 (GMT+0100)

Or you could just put it in it's own section named theory which would leave it up there just not as fact. Oh and hasanyone attempted to contact the members of the two groups being watched on thelast exibit page that are listed as member/informant? I would but I'm broke and can't afford to join the spiral.-Kickemwhentheyredown 14:28, 27 April 2007 (PDT)

The mention at 24.11.2 is almost assuredly Trent Reznor. The mention of "Hi-rez" immediately after [CLASSIFIED] there catches my attention, particularly in the context of this site being an official BoM evidence dossier. The casual spelling 'hi-rez' seems out of place and a possible allusion to Reznor. But you're right; every mention of [CLASSIFIED] doesn't have to refer to the same person. Since the entire site is building a case, writing "performance by dissident musician [CLASSIFIED]" seems to indicate that this person is a musician, as opposed to the other person who isn't. Otherwise, why bother to specify "dissident musician"? It would be understood that this person is a musician if it was all about the same person. Tsguitar 14:53, 28 April 2007 (PDT)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 It's nothing personal, it's simply because this is personal opinion and not cold, hard fact!<br/>
 -- [[User:justnine|justnine]], 16:40 27th April 2007 (GMT+0100)
 :Or you could just put it in it's own section named theory which would leave it up there just not as fact. Oh and hasanyone attempted to contact the members of the two groups being watched on thelast exibit page that are listed as member/informant? I would but I'm broke and can't afford to join the spiral.-[[User:Kickemwhentheyredown|Kickemwhentheyredown]] 14:28, 27 April 2007 (PDT)
+:The mention at 24.11.2 is almost assuredly Trent Reznor. The mention of "Hi-rez" immediately after [CLASSIFIED] there catches my attention, particularly in the context of this site being an official BoM evidence dossier. The casual spelling 'hi-rez' seems out of place and a possible allusion to Reznor. But you're right; every mention of [CLASSIFIED] doesn't have to refer to the same person. Since the entire site is building a case, writing "performance by dissident musician [CLASSIFIED]" seems to indicate that this person is a musician, as opposed to the other person who isn't. Otherwise, why bother to specify "dissident musician"? It would be understood that this person is a musician if it was all about the same person. [[User:Tsguitar|Tsguitar]] 14:53, 28 April 2007 (PDT)