Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Downward Spiral (halo)"
Heroicraptor (talk | contribs) m (Talk:The Downward Spiral (album) moved to Talk:The Downward Spiral (halo): naming convention) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We want this wiki to be comprehensive, don't we? Look at the Down In It pages, I think that's a good way to do things. We're not wikipedia after all. Otherwise that defeats the point of doing it at all. What do you guys think?--[[User:GrayscaleRain|GrayscaleRain]] 09:11, 16 February 2007 (PST) | We want this wiki to be comprehensive, don't we? Look at the Down In It pages, I think that's a good way to do things. We're not wikipedia after all. Otherwise that defeats the point of doing it at all. What do you guys think?--[[User:GrayscaleRain|GrayscaleRain]] 09:11, 16 February 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Industrial== | ||
| + | ''...is said to have brought "Industrial" music to the mainstream.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wasn't "industrial" music already brought to the mainstream by [[Pretty Hate Machine]], or so many claim? [[User:Pomte|Pomte]] 21:20, 16 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 05:20, 17 February 2007
I was thinking, the songs themselves are not the same entities as the halos with the same names (if not in the case of the singles, at least in the case of the LPs themselves. The Downward Spiral is clearly not the same entity as it's title track, the same goes for The Fragile, or With Teeth.)
We want this wiki to be comprehensive, don't we? Look at the Down In It pages, I think that's a good way to do things. We're not wikipedia after all. Otherwise that defeats the point of doing it at all. What do you guys think?--GrayscaleRain 09:11, 16 February 2007 (PST)
Industrial
...is said to have brought "Industrial" music to the mainstream.
Wasn't "industrial" music already brought to the mainstream by Pretty Hate Machine, or so many claim? Pomte 21:20, 16 February 2007 (PST)