Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ripe"
StockAvuryah (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Or at least its own section describing it - I'm not very good at assessing music, so if someone could write it up? They are really separate pieces [[User:Sheepdean|Sheepdean]] 15:51, 19 November 2008 (PST) | Or at least its own section describing it - I'm not very good at assessing music, so if someone could write it up? They are really separate pieces [[User:Sheepdean|Sheepdean]] 15:51, 19 November 2008 (PST) | ||
:I would say that the more known "Ripe (With Decay)" should be in its own section within the article.--[[User:Leo3375|leo3375]] 19:33, 19 November 2008 (PST) | :I would say that the more known "Ripe (With Decay)" should be in its own section within the article.--[[User:Leo3375|leo3375]] 19:33, 19 November 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | ::Can we talk about the fact that the original is Ripe (With Decay) ? As it says on this very wiki, the CD was thought as the definitive version of the album at the date of the release, before the vinyl version "grew" on Trent. But the Ripe version was first of all made because of a medium limitation (vinyl). So it's totally wrong to write that it's "an additional section", and to keep the title as simply "Ripe". There gotta be a switch. And even though the recent vinyl version is called "Definitive Edition", it's the definitive edition.. of the vinyl version, as Trent said. [[User:StockAvuryah|StockAvuryah]] 19:21, 02 November 20018 (GMT+1) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 2 November 2018
I have never heard of the Ripe version without the With Decay ending until just a few minutes ago from this page... Where can I Listen/get the version without With Decay, or is that even possible? Jgrizzy89 18:15, 23 May 2007 (PDT)
- It's on the vinyl. -Heroicraptor 22:14, 23 May 2007 (PDT)
Should decay get its own page?
Or at least its own section describing it - I'm not very good at assessing music, so if someone could write it up? They are really separate pieces Sheepdean 15:51, 19 November 2008 (PST)
- I would say that the more known "Ripe (With Decay)" should be in its own section within the article.--leo3375 19:33, 19 November 2008 (PST)
- Can we talk about the fact that the original is Ripe (With Decay) ? As it says on this very wiki, the CD was thought as the definitive version of the album at the date of the release, before the vinyl version "grew" on Trent. But the Ripe version was first of all made because of a medium limitation (vinyl). So it's totally wrong to write that it's "an additional section", and to keep the title as simply "Ripe". There gotta be a switch. And even though the recent vinyl version is called "Definitive Edition", it's the definitive edition.. of the vinyl version, as Trent said. StockAvuryah 19:21, 02 November 20018 (GMT+1)