Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tapeworm"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We have a fair few articles for Tapeworm, members and a couple of songs now, would a Tapeworm category be useful? Just wonderin' [[User:Sheepdean|sheepdean]] [[User_talk:Sheepdean|Try to speak as clearly as you can]] 19:08, 26 March 2010 (PDT) | We have a fair few articles for Tapeworm, members and a couple of songs now, would a Tapeworm category be useful? Just wonderin' [[User:Sheepdean|sheepdean]] [[User_talk:Sheepdean|Try to speak as clearly as you can]] 19:08, 26 March 2010 (PDT) | ||
:A tapeworm category would most certainly be useful [[User:Malechite|Malechite]] 09:21, 29 March 2010 (PDT) | :A tapeworm category would most certainly be useful [[User:Malechite|Malechite]] 09:21, 29 March 2010 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::Alright, I'll bung it in as a related to NIN subcategory *gets to work* [[User:Sheepdean|sheepdean]] [[User_talk:Sheepdean|Try to speak as clearly as you can]] 11:00, 29 March 2010 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:00, 29 March 2010
New category?
We have a fair few articles for Tapeworm, members and a couple of songs now, would a Tapeworm category be useful? Just wonderin' sheepdean Try to speak as clearly as you can 19:08, 26 March 2010 (PDT)
- A tapeworm category would most certainly be useful Malechite 09:21, 29 March 2010 (PDT)
- Alright, I'll bung it in as a related to NIN subcategory *gets to work* sheepdean Try to speak as clearly as you can 11:00, 29 March 2010 (PDT)