Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"

Latest revision as of 23:49, 12 March 2011

Not to be rude, but I'm not really liking the 2 column formatting. To me, it looks very sloppy and confusing. M.A.X. 16:16, 28 April 2007 (PDT)

Songs

Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --Tony^converse! 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT)

If we remove the songs, when what's next? The albums? Maybe band member names? To tell the truth, I had envisioned the Glossary to be a whole lot bigger than it is now. Once it got enough information on it, I wanted to split each letter into its own page. Is my vision too grand? M.A.X. 06:36, 12 May 2007 (PDT)

Names

Why are they listed under first name? -Heroicraptor 13:10, 26 May 2007 (PDT)

I plan on formatting this once all the entries are filled in. That will include alphabetizing people by last name.--Leo3375 13:15, 26 May 2007 (PDT)

Acronym standard

I have made all acronyms here link to the respective article within this page (i.e. THTF now links to Glossary#The Hand That Feeds rather than The Hand That Feeds. It seemed to work better than throwing people to a disambigutaion page, when they may be only looking for the small bit of info that is here. If anyone has a problem, revert the changes, but if we could make this standard, I think it owuld look much better. Sheepdean 08:18, 23 July 2008 (PDT)

Headings standard

I noticed that there is no standard for formatting each entry's heading. Some headings that are song titles or halo titles are formatted, but the majority (starting with about letter J) are plain. I think the best way to go is for every heading to be plain and then any song titles or halo titles within the text under each heading can be formatted accordingly. This way, there will be no confusion as to how to format a heading that refers to both a song and a halo and though it pains me to say it, it kind of looks better and is definitely easier to read that way. If that's agreed by everyone else, I will take care of the task of making everything uniform. Piggy 16:32, 12 March 2011 (PDT)

Revision as of 23:30, 12 March 2011 (view source) Piggy (talk \| contribs) (→‎Headings standard: new section) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:49, 12 March 2011 (view source) Piggy (talk \| contribs) (→‎Headings standard)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Headings standard ==		== Headings standard ==

−	I noticed that there is no standard for formatting each entry's heading. Some headings that are song titles ~~and~~ halo titles are formatted, but the majority (starting with about letter J) are plain. I think the best way to go is for every heading to be plain and then any song titles or halo titles within the text under each heading can be formatted accordingly. This way, there will be no confusion as to how to format a heading that refers to both a song and a halo and though it pains me to say it, it kind of looks better and is definitely easier to read that way. If that's agreed by everyone else, I will take care of the task of making everything uniform.	+	I noticed that there is no standard for formatting each entry's heading. Some headings that are song titles or halo titles are formatted, but the majority (starting with about letter J) are plain. I think the best way to go is for every heading to be plain and then any song titles or halo titles within the text under each heading can be formatted accordingly. This way, there will be no confusion as to how to format a heading that refers to both a song and a halo and though it pains me to say it, it kind of looks better and is definitely easier to read that way. If that's agreed by everyone else, I will take care of the task of making everything uniform. [[User:Piggy\|Piggy]] 16:32, 12 March 2011 (PDT)