Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nincollector.com"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::For now, I've removed the links on those pages and made them past tense. I'm thinking of making a list page that collects info on past and presnt fan sites in one place.--[[User:Piggy|Piggy]] ([[User talk:Piggy|talk]]) 09:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC) | ::For now, I've removed the links on those pages and made them past tense. I'm thinking of making a list page that collects info on past and presnt fan sites in one place.--[[User:Piggy|Piggy]] ([[User talk:Piggy|talk]]) 09:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::[[Ninternet]] [[User:Tabanger|Tabanger]] ([[User talk:Tabanger|talk]]) 10:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC) | :::[[Ninternet]] [[User:Tabanger|Tabanger]] ([[User talk:Tabanger|talk]]) 10:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::I knew about the category, but I'm wondering if we should make a page with short sections of info right there on the page instead of having some pages where there is just one or two sentences on it (like burning souls and nincollector). Also, I don't know whether to make new pages about sites like nindestruct.com, happinessinheresy.com, etc. or just have short blurbs about them on a list page like I was talking about. Then we could even add blurbs about a few selected really old sites (like Above The Trees or Smashed Up Sanity, etc.) that also don't have pages about them. What do you guys think?--[[User:Piggy|Piggy]] ([[User talk:Piggy|talk]]) 11:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::::I think it makes sense to have inactive sites listed on one page with blurbs, and then have active sites, like [[Echoing The Sound]], still with dedicated pages. Or perhaps a page to differentiate the active sites from the inactive ones, each with blurbage.<br>[[User:AIRNIN|AIRNIN]] ([[User talk:AIRNIN|talk]]) 05:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:50, 26 September 2022
Decommissioned
This website, as well as Burning Souls, both appear to no longer be active.
I'm curious if all references should be wiped from the site, or at least external links removed and changing the wordage on the sites pages to reflect past tense.
AIRNIN (talk) 05:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- For now, I've removed the links on those pages and made them past tense. I'm thinking of making a list page that collects info on past and presnt fan sites in one place.--Piggy (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ninternet Tabanger (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- I knew about the category, but I'm wondering if we should make a page with short sections of info right there on the page instead of having some pages where there is just one or two sentences on it (like burning souls and nincollector). Also, I don't know whether to make new pages about sites like nindestruct.com, happinessinheresy.com, etc. or just have short blurbs about them on a list page like I was talking about. Then we could even add blurbs about a few selected really old sites (like Above The Trees or Smashed Up Sanity, etc.) that also don't have pages about them. What do you guys think?--Piggy (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ninternet Tabanger (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- For now, I've removed the links on those pages and made them past tense. I'm thinking of making a list page that collects info on past and presnt fan sites in one place.--Piggy (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think it makes sense to have inactive sites listed on one page with blurbs, and then have active sites, like Echoing The Sound, still with dedicated pages. Or perhaps a page to differentiate the active sites from the inactive ones, each with blurbage.
AIRNIN (talk) 05:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think it makes sense to have inactive sites listed on one page with blurbs, and then have active sites, like Echoing The Sound, still with dedicated pages. Or perhaps a page to differentiate the active sites from the inactive ones, each with blurbage.