Interscope Records

Interscope Records is the record label to which Nine Inch Nails have been signed to from 1992 to 2007 after a much-publicized feud with TVT Records, the first record label to sign the band. Ultimately TVT entered into a joint venture with Interscope Records that allowed Trent Reznor to begin releasing NIN albums on his own Nothing Records imprint, set up with his then manager, John Malm.

Interscope is owned by Universal Music Group, and operates as one third of UMG's Interscope-Geffen-A&M label group.

Criticism

Universal Music Group & Year Zero Pricing

On May 13, 2007 Reznor made a post on his blog on the official Nine Inch Nails website condemning Universal Music Group for their pricing and distribution plans for Year Zero. The full text of that post is as follows:

“As the climate grows more and more desperate for record labels, their answer to their mostly self-inflicted wounds seems to be to screw the consumer over even more. A couple of examples that quickly come to mind:

* The ABSURD retail pricing of Year Zero in Australia. Shame on you, UMG. Year Zero is selling for $34.99 Australian dollars ($29.10 US). No wonder people steal music. Avril Lavigne's record in the same store was $21.99 ($18.21 US). By the way, when I asked a label rep about this his response was: "It's because we know you have a real core audience that will pay whatever it costs when you put something out - you know, true fans. It's the pop stuff we have to discount to get people to buy." So... I guess as a reward for being a "true fan" you get ripped off.

* The dreaded EURO Maxi-single. Nothing but a consumer rip-off that I've been talked into my whole career. No more.

The point is, I am trying my best to make sure the music and items NIN puts in the marketplace have value, substance and are worth you considering purchasing. I am not allowing Capital G to be repackaged into several configurations that result in you getting ripped off.

We are planning a full-length remix collection of substance that will be announced soon.”

Self Release?

After the above post, Reznor stated in an interview that he was interested in self-releasing future material:

"I have one record left that I owe a major label, then I will never be seen in a situation like this again. If I could do what I want right now, I would put out my next album, you could download it from my site at as high a bit-rate as you want, pay $4 through PayPal. Come see the show and buy a T-shirt if you like it. I would put out a nicely packaged merchandise piece, if you want to own a physical thing. And it would come out the day that it's done in the studio, not this "Let's wait three months" bulls---."[1]

On October 8, 2007, Reznor announced that he was a free agent through a posting at both nin.com and The Spiral:

"Hello everyone. I've waited a LONG time to be able to make the 
following announcement: as of right now Nine Inch Nails is a totally 
free agent, free of any recording contract with any label. I have 
been under recording contracts for 18 years and have watched the 
business radically mutate from one thing to something inherently very 
different and it gives me great pleasure to be able to finally have a 
direct relationship with the audience as I see fit and appropriate.
Look for some announcements in the near future regarding 2008. 
Exciting times, indeed.

Remixing

In a posting on nin.com on 11/20/2007, Reznor explained that the launch of remix.nin.com that was supposed to accompany the release of Y34RZ3R0R3M1X3D and all Year Zero multitracks had been delayed due to a legal hitch caused by Universal:

My former record company and current owner of all these master files, Universal, is currently involved in a lawsuit with other media
titans Google (YouTube) and News Corp (MySpace). Universal is contending that these sites do not have what is referred to as "safe
harbor" under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and therefore are in copyright violation because users have uploaded music and
video content that is owned by Universal. Universal feels that if they host our remix site, they will be opening themselves up to
the accusation that they are sponsoring the same technical violation of copyright they are suing these companies for. Their premise
is that if any fan decides to remix one of my masters with material Universal doesn't own - a "mash-up", a sample, whatever - and
upload it to the site, there is no safe harbor under the DMCA (according to Universal) and they will be doing exactly what MySpace
and YouTube are doing. This behavior may get hauled out in court and impact their lawsuit. Because of this they no longer will host
our remix site, and are insisting that Nine Inch Nails host it. In exchange for this they will continue to let me upload my
Universal masters and make them available to fans, BUT shift the liability of hosting them to me. Part of the arrangement is having
user licenses that the fans sign (not unlike those on MySpace or You Tube) saying they will not use unauthorized materials. If they
WERE to do such a thing, everybody sues everybody and the world abruptly ends.

While I am profoundly perturbed with this stance as content owners continue to stifle all innovation in the face of the digital
revolution, it is consistent with what they have done in the past. So... we are challenged at the last second to find a way of
bringing this idea to life without getting splashed by the urine as these media companies piss all over each other’s feet. We
have a cool and innovative site ready to launch but we're currently scratching our heads as to how to proceed.
More to come….

The full post can be read here

External Links

• Interscope Records website
• Nine Inch Nails at Interscope Records
• Interscope Records at Wikipedia