Difference between revisions of "User talk:Scicks"
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
If you haven't noticed, the songs themselves are not the same entities as the halos with the same names (if not in the case of the singles, at least in the case of the LPs themselves. The Downward Spiral is clearly not the same entity as it's title track, the same goes for The Fragile, or With Teeth.) | If you haven't noticed, the songs themselves are not the same entities as the halos with the same names (if not in the case of the singles, at least in the case of the LPs themselves. The Downward Spiral is clearly not the same entity as it's title track, the same goes for The Fragile, or With Teeth.) | ||
− | We want this wiki to be comprehensive, don't we? Look at the Down In It pages, I think that's a good way to do things. We're not wikipedia after all. Otherwise that defeats the point of doing it at all. --[[User:GrayscaleRain|GrayscaleRain]] 05:55, 16 February 2007 (PST) | + | We want this wiki to be comprehensive, don't we? Look at the Down In It pages, I think that's a good way to do things. We're not wikipedia after all. Otherwise that defeats the point of doing it at all. |
+ | |||
+ | Edit: And when you create a halo page, try not to c/p directly from wikipedia, that sort of defeats the point. --[[User:GrayscaleRain|GrayscaleRain]] 05:55, 16 February 2007 (PST) |
Revision as of 14:18, 16 February 2007
Scicks on ETS.
erased on the spiral
Why do you keep on merging the song and halo pages?
If you haven't noticed, the songs themselves are not the same entities as the halos with the same names (if not in the case of the singles, at least in the case of the LPs themselves. The Downward Spiral is clearly not the same entity as it's title track, the same goes for The Fragile, or With Teeth.)
We want this wiki to be comprehensive, don't we? Look at the Down In It pages, I think that's a good way to do things. We're not wikipedia after all. Otherwise that defeats the point of doing it at all.
Edit: And when you create a halo page, try not to c/p directly from wikipedia, that sort of defeats the point. --GrayscaleRain 05:55, 16 February 2007 (PST)