Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"
(New page: Not to be rude, but I'm not really liking the 2 column formatting. To me, it looks very sloppy and confusing. ~~~~) |
(Songs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not to be rude, but I'm not really liking the 2 column formatting. To me, it looks very sloppy and confusing. [[User:Marcusaxavier77|M.A.X.]] 16:16, 28 April 2007 (PDT) | Not to be rude, but I'm not really liking the 2 column formatting. To me, it looks very sloppy and confusing. [[User:Marcusaxavier77|M.A.X.]] 16:16, 28 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Songs == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --[[User:Tony|Tony]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tony|converse!]]</sup> 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT) |
Revision as of 22:30, 11 May 2007
Not to be rude, but I'm not really liking the 2 column formatting. To me, it looks very sloppy and confusing. M.A.X. 16:16, 28 April 2007 (PDT)
Songs
Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --Tonyconverse! 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT)