Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"

Revision as of 13:36, 12 May 2007

Not to be rude, but I'm not really liking the 2 column formatting. To me, it looks very sloppy and confusing. M.A.X. 16:16, 28 April 2007 (PDT)

Songs

Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --Tony^converse! 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT)

If we remove the songs, when what's next? The albums? Maybe band member names? To tell the truth, I had envisioned the Glossary to be a whole lot bigger than it is now. Once it got enough information on it, I wanted to split each letter into its own page. Is my vision too grand? M.A.X. 06:36, 12 May 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 22:30, 11 May 2007 (view source) Tony (talk \| contribs) (Songs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:36, 12 May 2007 (view source) Marcusaxavier77 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Songs) Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --[[User:Tony\|Tony]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tony\|converse!]]</sup> 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT)		Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --[[User:Tony\|Tony]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tony\|converse!]]</sup> 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT)
		+	:If we remove the songs, when what's next? The albums? Maybe band member names? To tell the truth, I had envisioned the Glossary to be a whole lot bigger than it is now. Once it got enough information on it, I wanted to split each letter into its own page. Is my vision too grand? [[User:Marcusaxavier77\|M.A.X.]] 06:36, 12 May 2007 (PDT)