Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"
(Songs) |
(→Songs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --[[User:Tony|Tony]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tony|converse!]]</sup> 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT) | Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --[[User:Tony|Tony]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tony|converse!]]</sup> 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | :If we remove the songs, when what's next? The albums? Maybe band member names? To tell the truth, I had envisioned the Glossary to be a whole lot bigger than it is now. Once it got enough information on it, I wanted to split each letter into its own page. Is my vision too grand? [[User:Marcusaxavier77|M.A.X.]] 06:36, 12 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:36, 12 May 2007
Not to be rude, but I'm not really liking the 2 column formatting. To me, it looks very sloppy and confusing. M.A.X. 16:16, 28 April 2007 (PDT)
Songs
Do we really need to add all of the songs into the Glossary? I think it'd make it bloated, but there are lots of them there already. --Tonyconverse! 15:30, 11 May 2007 (PDT)
- If we remove the songs, when what's next? The albums? Maybe band member names? To tell the truth, I had envisioned the Glossary to be a whole lot bigger than it is now. Once it got enough information on it, I wanted to split each letter into its own page. Is my vision too grand? M.A.X. 06:36, 12 May 2007 (PDT)